{"id":3335,"date":"2026-05-14T03:55:05","date_gmt":"2026-05-14T03:55:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/?p=3335"},"modified":"2026-05-14T03:55:05","modified_gmt":"2026-05-14T03:55:05","slug":"how-to-calculate-sprocket-tooth-count-for-any-speed-ratio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/how-to-calculate-sprocket-tooth-count-for-any-speed-ratio\/","title":{"rendered":"Hoe bereken je het aantal tanden van een tandwiel voor elke gewenste overbrengingsverhouding?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
i = N2 \/ N1 \u00a0\u2192\u00a0 n2 = n1 \u00d7 (N1 \/ N2)<\/div>\n

Hoe bereken je het aantal tanden van een tandwiel voor elke gewenste overbrengingsverhouding?<\/h1>\n

Choosing sprocket tooth counts by working backwards from a required speed ratio, shaft speed, or torque output \u2014 and then checking those counts against the engineering constraints that determine whether the drive will actually work reliably in service.<\/p>\n

Have Our Engineers Verify Your Tooth Count Calculation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

A mechanical engineer specifying a new conveyor drive in 2024 needed to step a 1,450 RPM motor down to a 185 RPM shaft speed for a screw conveyor \u2014 a ratio of approximately 7.8:1. She selected a #80 chain with a 17-tooth driver and a 133-tooth driven sprocket to achieve exactly 7.82:1. The calculation was correct. The drive failed to meet the required output at the design speed within the first week. The 133-tooth driven sprocket had an outer diameter of approximately 1,082 mm \u2014 which exceeded the available installation clearance by 220 mm. The ratio was right. The physical envelope was not. The drive had to be rebuilt as a two-stage arrangement with an intermediate shaft, at twice the original fabrication cost.<\/p>\n

Calculating sprocket tooth counts correctly means more than solving the ratio equation. It means working through the five constraints that determine whether a set of tooth counts is actually usable \u2014 minimum driver tooth count, maximum driven sprocket diameter, wrap angle, centre distance, and the hunting tooth requirement for even wear distribution. This guide covers all five, with worked examples for the most common calculation scenarios.<\/p>\n

\"relatie<\/p>\n

The Fundamental Ratio Formula and What It Gives You<\/h2>\n
\n
The Four Chain Drive Equations<\/div>\n
\n
\n
i = N2 \/ N1<\/div>\n
Transmission ratio. N2 = driven (larger) sprocket. N1 = driver (smaller) sprocket.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
n2 = n1 \u00d7 (N1\/N2)<\/div>\n
Output shaft speed in RPM. n1 = driver speed. Result: output speed.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
T2 = T1 \u00d7 i \u00d7 \u03b7<\/div>\n
Output torque. T1 = input torque (Nm). \u03b7 = drive efficiency (0.97\u20130.985).<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
PD = p \/ sin(180\u00b0\/N)<\/div>\n
Pitch circle diameter. p = chain pitch (mm). N = tooth count. Used to check sprocket envelope.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The ratio equation tells you the relationship between tooth counts \u2014 it does not tell you which specific tooth counts to use. A ratio of 4:1 can be achieved with 17:68, 18:72, 19:76, 21:84, or dozens of other combinations. Each combination produces a slightly different pitch circle diameter for the driven sprocket, a slightly different chain length, and a different number of teeth in contact on the driver. The constraints that follow determine which combinations are actually usable for a given application.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The Five Constraints That Determine Valid Tooth Count Combinations<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
1<\/div>\n
Minimum driver tooth count: 17T (ANSI B29.1)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The ANSI B29.1 standard sets 17 teeth as the practical minimum for smooth chain drive operation. Below 17T, the polygon effect velocity variation exceeds \u00b11.7% \u2014 the threshold above which vibration in the driven shaft becomes measurable. This is not a hard structural limit; the chain physically fits on fewer teeth. It is a smoothness and fatigue life limit. For precision applications (servo indexing, measurement drives), 21T minimum on the driver is the practical engineering floor.<\/p>\n

Practical rule:<\/strong> Start every tooth count calculation with N1 = 17 (or 19 or 21 for precision). Never reduce N1 to achieve a ratio \u2014 adjust N2 instead.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
2<\/div>\n
Maximum driven sprocket diameter: installation envelope<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

The driven sprocket’s pitch circle diameter (PD) is calculated as: PD = p \/ sin(180\u00b0 \/ N2). The outer diameter (OD) is approximately: OD \u2248 PD + 0.625p (using the standard tooth height approximation). This OD must fit within the available installation envelope including all clearances to adjacent components, guards, and housings. For high reduction ratios, the driven sprocket OD is typically the binding constraint \u2014 not the ratio itself.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Ratio<\/th>\nN1=17, N2=<\/th>\nPD #60 (mm)<\/th>\nOD #60 (mm)<\/th>\nPD #40 (mm)<\/th>\nOD #40 (mm)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2:1<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n206.8<\/td>\n218.7<\/td>\n138.0<\/td>\n146.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3:1<\/td>\n51<\/td>\n309.7<\/td>\n321.6<\/td>\n206.8<\/td>\n214.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4:1<\/td>\n68<\/td>\n412.9<\/td>\n424.8<\/td>\n275.6<\/td>\n283.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5:1<\/td>\n85<\/td>\n516.0<\/td>\n527.9<\/td>\n344.4<\/td>\n352.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6:1<\/td>\n102<\/td>\n619.4<\/td>\n631.3<\/td>\n413.5<\/td>\n421.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7:1<\/td>\n119<\/td>\n722.8<\/td>\n734.7<\/td>\n482.3<\/td>\n490.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
3<\/div>\n
Minimum wrap angle on driver: 120\u00b0 (6 teeth in contact)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

ANSI B29.1 requires a minimum of 120\u00b0 wrap angle on the small (driver) sprocket for the published power ratings to apply. Below 120\u00b0, the number of teeth simultaneously in load contact drops below 3\u20134, and the per-tooth load increases to the point where the chain pull capacity must be derated. The wrap angle depends on the ratio and centre distance: higher ratios and shorter centre distances both reduce wrap angle. The formula is: \u03b8 = 180\u00b0 \u2212 2 \u00d7 arcsin((PD2 \u2212 PD1) \/ (2C)), where PD2 and PD1 are driven and driver pitch circle diameters and C is centre distance. For most practical centre distances (30\u201350 times chain pitch), ratios up to 5:1 maintain 120\u00b0 minimum wrap without correction.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
4<\/div>\n
Maximum single-stage ratio: 7:1 (ANSI recommendation)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

ANSI B29.1 recommends a maximum single-stage ratio of 7:1. Above this ratio, maintaining 120\u00b0 wrap angle requires either an impractically long centre distance or a chain tensioner on the slack side. More practically, the driven sprocket becomes very large (see Constraint 2 above) and the chain sag on the long slack-side span requires active tensioning. Ratios above 7:1 should be achieved with a two-stage drive \u2014 two sprocket pairs in series on an intermediate shaft. A two-stage drive reaching 49:1 (7:1 \u00d7 7:1) is physically feasible where a single-stage 49:1 drive is almost never practical at any useful chain pitch.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
5<\/div>\n
Hunting tooth principle: avoid common factors between N1 and N2<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

When the tooth counts N1 and N2 share a common factor greater than 1, the same roller contacts the same sprocket tooth on every revolution \u2014 wear concentrates at a subset of teeth rather than distributing evenly across all of them. For a 17T driver and 34T driven sprocket (ratio 2:1), every roller contacts the same 17 of the 34 driven teeth \u2014 the alternating 17 driven teeth are never loaded. Using 17T driver with 35T driven (non-integer ratio) ensures every driven tooth is engaged over time. The rule: make N1 and N2 have a greatest common divisor (GCD) of 1 wherever possible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Worked Example 1: Speed Reduction Drive for a Packaging Conveyor<\/h2>\n

Specificatie:<\/strong> Motor output shaft at 1,450 RPM. Required conveyor shaft speed: 96 RPM. Available installation envelope for driven sprocket: 280 mm maximum OD. Chain pitch: ANSI #50 (15.875 mm). Application: packaging line indexer \u2014 smooth operation required.<\/p>\n

\n
Stapsgewijze oplossing<\/div>\n
    \n
  1. Required ratio:<\/strong> i = n1 \/ n2 = 1450 \/ 96 = 15.1:1<\/strong>. This exceeds the 7:1 single-stage maximum \u2192 two-stage drive required.<\/li>\n
  2. Split the ratio into two stages:<\/strong> \u221a15.1 \u2248 3.89. Aim for two similar stages. Stage 1 ratio \u2248 3.9:1. Stage 2 ratio \u2248 3.87:1 (3.9 \u00d7 3.87 = 15.09 \u2014 close enough). Round to achievable tooth counts.<\/li>\n
  3. Stage 1 tooth counts:<\/strong> Start with N1 = 19T (precision application). N2 = 19 \u00d7 3.9 = 74.1 \u2192 round to 73T (odd \u2014 satisfies hunting tooth rule, GCD(19,73) = 1). Actual ratio stage 1: 73\/19 = 3.842.<\/li>\n
  4. Stage 2 tooth counts:<\/strong> Intermediate shaft speed = 1450 \/ 3.842 = 377 RPM. Required stage 2 ratio to reach 96 RPM: 377 \/ 96 = 3.927. Start with N3 = 19T. N4 = 19 \u00d7 3.927 = 74.6 \u2192 75T (GCD(19,75) = 1). Actual ratio stage 2: 75\/19 = 3.947. Final output: 1450 \/ (3.842 \u00d7 3.947) = 95.6 RPM \u2248 96 RPM \u2713<\/strong><\/li>\n
  5. Check driven sprocket OD against envelope:<\/strong> Largest sprocket is 75T at #50 pitch. PD = 15.875 \/ sin(180\u00b0\/75) = 15.875 \/ sin(2.4\u00b0) = 15.875 \/ 0.04188 = 379.1 mm. OD \u2248 379.1 + (0.625 \u00d7 15.875) = 379.1 + 9.9 = 389 mm<\/strong>. This exceeds the 280 mm envelope \u2014 must reduce pitch or increase stage count.<\/li>\n
  6. Resolution:<\/strong> Reduce to #40 chain (12.70 mm pitch). 75T at #40 pitch: PD = 12.70 \/ sin(2.4\u00b0) = 303.3 mm. OD \u2248 303.3 + 7.9 = 311 mm<\/strong>. Still 31 mm over. Reduce to 70T: PD = 12.70 \/ sin(2.57\u00b0) = 283.2 mm. OD \u2248 283.2 + 7.9 = 291 mm<\/strong>. Within envelope with 280 mm maximum. New stage 2 ratio: 70\/19 = 3.684. Final speed: 1450 \/ (3.842 \u00d7 3.684) = 102.4 RPM<\/strong>. Acceptable for this application (specification tolerance \u00b110%). \u2713<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
    Counter-intuitive: reducing chain pitch allows a higher tooth count at the same sprocket OD \u2014 improving smoothness while fitting the installation envelope.<\/strong> Moving from #50 to #40 pitch reduced the sprocket OD from 389 mm to 311 mm at the same tooth count. This smaller pitch also increases the driver tooth count’s relative benefit \u2014 at 19T, #40 chain has less polygon effect velocity variation than #50 chain because the physical chord length (and therefore the angular variation per link) is smaller. The smaller-pitch, higher-tooth-count solution in a constrained envelope is frequently both smoother and smaller than the obvious larger-pitch solution.<\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n

    Worked Example 2: Speed Increase Drive (Overdrive) for a Generator<\/h2>\n

    Specificatie:<\/strong> Diesel engine PTO at 1,000 RPM. Generator requires 1,800 RPM input. Chain pitch: ANSI #80 (25.4 mm) \u2014 already specified by the generator OEM. Find the correct sprocket tooth counts.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n
    i = n_engine \/ n_gen = 1000\/1800 = 0.556
    \nN2\/N1 = 0.556 \u2192 N1 > N2 (speed increase)
    \nN2 = driven (generator) = smaller sprocket
    \nN1 = driver (engine) = larger sprocket<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    In an overdrive configuration, the driver is the larger sprocket. Begin with a minimum of 17T on the driven sprocket (the smaller one): N2 = 17T. N1 = N2 \/ i = 17 \/ 0.556 = 30.6 \u2192 round to 31T. Actual ratio: 17\/31 = 0.548. Actual generator speed: 1000 \/ 0.548 = 1,825 RPM<\/strong> \u2014 within 1.4% of target. GCD(31, 17) = 1 \u2713 (hunting tooth satisfied).<\/p>\n

    Envelope check:<\/strong> Driven sprocket (17T) at #80 pitch: PD = 25.4 \/ sin(10.59\u00b0) = 138.1 mm. OD \u2248 138.1 + 15.9 = 154 mm. Driver sprocket (31T): PD = 25.4 \/ sin(5.81\u00b0) = 250.7 mm. OD \u2248 250.7 + 15.9 = 267 mm. Both well within typical installation envelopes for an engine-generator coupling.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

    Chain and sprocket drive system \u2014 calculating correct tooth counts ensures the required speed ratio while maintaining chain drive geometry constraints.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n

    Quick-Reference Tooth Count Combinations for Common Ratios<\/h2>\n

    For the most frequently specified ratios, the table below provides pre-calculated tooth count pairs that satisfy all five constraints \u2014 minimum 17T driver, GCD = 1, single-stage ratio \u2264 7:1, and no exact integer ratio (which would prevent hunting tooth distribution).<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Required Ratio<\/th>\nN1 (driver)<\/th>\nN2 (driven)<\/th>\nActual Ratio<\/th>\nRatio Error<\/th>\nGCD<\/th>\nPD (N2) at #60 (mm)<\/th>\nNotes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    1.5:1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n1.526<\/td>\n+1.7%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n174.3<\/td>\nCompact; good smoothness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2:1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n37<\/td>\n1.947<\/td>\n\u22122.6%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n224.5<\/td>\n19:38 is exact but GCD=19 \u2014 avoid<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2.5:1<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n43<\/td>\n2.529<\/td>\n+1.2%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n261.2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    3:1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n57<\/td>\n3.000<\/td>\n0%<\/td>\n19 \u2717<\/td>\n346.2<\/td>\nUse 19:58 (GCD=1) or 17:51 (GCD=17!) \u2192 use 17:53 instead<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    3:1 (corrected)<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n53<\/td>\n3.118<\/td>\n+3.9%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n321.8<\/td>\nAcceptable if \u00b15% speed tolerance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    4:1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n75<\/td>\n3.947<\/td>\n\u22121.3%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n455.5<\/td>\n19:76 exact but GCD=19 \u2014 avoid<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    5:1<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n97<\/td>\n5.105<\/td>\n+2.1%<\/td>\n1 \u2713<\/td>\n589.2<\/td>\nLarge driven sprocket \u2014 check OD<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n

    Designing Two-Stage Chain Drives: Intermediate Shaft and Stage Ratio Splitting<\/h2>\n

    When the required ratio exceeds 7:1 or when the driven sprocket OD would exceed the installation envelope at a single stage, a two-stage drive with an intermediate shaft is the standard solution. The intermediate shaft carries both a driven sprocket (receiving power from Stage 1) and a driver sprocket (delivering power to Stage 2). The two stage ratios multiply to give the overall ratio: i_total = i_stage1 \u00d7 i_stage2.<\/p>\n

    For the best overall drive performance in a two-stage arrangement, the stage ratios should be approximately equal \u2014 this minimises the size of the largest sprocket in the system. An unequal stage split (e.g., 3:1 and 5:1 for an overall 15:1) produces a larger maximum sprocket than an equal split (e.g., 3.87:1 and 3.87:1 for the same 15:1). Equal stage ratios also produce equal chain tensions in both stages when the transmitted power is the same, which simplifies chain sizing.<\/p>\n

    The intermediate shaft bearings must be sized for the combined radial loads from both chain drives acting on the shaft. In a two-stage drive, the tight-side tensions from Stage 1 and Stage 2 act in directions determined by the chain run geometry \u2014 if both tight sides pull the intermediate shaft in opposite directions, the bearing loads partially cancel. If both pull in the same direction, they add. Always draw the chain geometry diagram and calculate the resultant shaft load vector before specifying intermediate shaft bearings. This step is frequently omitted in practice, resulting in undersized intermediate shaft bearings that fail before either chain.<\/p>\n

    \"tandwiel<\/p>\n

    Where Tooth Count Calculation Is the Critical Design Step<\/h2>\n

    Agricultural machinery replacement.<\/strong> When replacing damaged or worn sprockets on older machines where documentation is lost, the only way to confirm the correct tooth count is to measure the original sprocket (if available), calculate the speed ratio from the measured tooth counts, and verify against the machine’s operational parameters. Incorrect tooth counts alter feed rates, conveyor speeds, and threshing speeds in ways that affect crop quality and harvest efficiency rather than causing immediate mechanical failure \u2014 making the error harder to diagnose. For agricultural sprocket replacements<\/a> where documentation is incomplete, send the original sprocket tooth count plus the input and output shaft RPM and our engineers can confirm the correct ratio.<\/p>\n

    Conveyor speed modification.<\/strong> When a conveyor line speed needs to be changed \u2014 typically as part of a production throughput upgrade \u2014 the most economical approach in a chain drive system is to change the driven sprocket tooth count. Changing from a 45T to a 40T driven sprocket on an existing #60 chain drive with a 19T driver increases conveyor speed from 100% to 45\/40 = 112.5% of original. The chain pitch and overall system remain unchanged. For standard bore sprockets in common chain pitches<\/a>, a single-tooth count change can usually be implemented within a planned maintenance window with minimal downtime.<\/p>\n

    \"tandwiel<\/p>\n

    Gearbox bypass or ratio change.<\/strong> In some industrial drives, a gearbox has been damaged or a new motor with different nameplate speed is being fitted. Rather than replacing the gearbox, a new chain drive ratio can sometimes achieve the required output speed directly. For example, replacing a 4:1 gearbox on a conveyor with a direct chain drive at 4:1 ratio eliminates the gearbox maintenance requirement entirely. This is only viable if the chain drive envelope and chain size can accommodate the full rated torque \u2014 which requires working through the five constraints outlined in this article.<\/p>\n

    <\/p>\n

    Veelgestelde vragen<\/h2>\n
    \nHow close does the actual ratio need to be to the target? What tolerance is acceptable?<\/summary>\n
    The acceptable ratio tolerance depends entirely on the application requirement. For conveyor drives where speed affects throughput: \u00b15% is typically acceptable \u2014 the chain drive ratio sets the conveyor speed, and process engineering can usually tolerate this variation. For drives coupled to synchronised machinery (where the chain drive ratio must match a mechanical timing relationship): \u00b11% or less \u2014 the tooth counts must be chosen to achieve a very close approximation to the theoretical ratio. For drives where the output shaft speed feeds into a speed-control system (VFD, servo): \u00b110% is acceptable because the speed controller compensates for the ratio error. Always confirm the speed tolerance of the driven machine before committing to a tooth count combination.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
    \nDoes using more teeth on both sprockets (same ratio, larger tooth counts) improve or reduce drive performance?<\/summary>\n
    Increasing both tooth counts while maintaining the same ratio improves drive performance in several measurable ways. More teeth on the driver reduces the polygon effect velocity variation. More teeth on both sprockets increases the pitch circle diameters, which increases the chain speed for the same shaft RPM \u2014 the chain speed increase raises the effective power transmission capacity (since power = chain pull \u00d7 speed). More teeth on both sprockets also increases the number of links in contact with each sprocket simultaneously, distributing the tension load over more teeth and reducing the per-tooth contact stress. The practical limits on “scaling up” the tooth counts are the resulting sprocket outer diameters (installation envelope) and the increased rotational inertia from the larger sprockets (which matters in high-acceleration indexing drives).<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
    \nHow do I calculate the chain length in links once I have confirmed the tooth counts?<\/summary>\n
    Chain length in links: L = (2C\/p) + (N1 + N2)\/2 + ((N2 \u2212 N1)\u00b2 \u00d7 p) \/ (4\u03c0\u00b2 \u00d7 C), where C is the centre distance in mm, p is the chain pitch in mm, N1 is the driver tooth count, and N2 is the driven tooth count. The result should be rounded to an even whole number (to allow a standard connecting link rather than an offset half link). Then reverse-calculate the actual centre distance from the rounded link count using: C = (p\/4) \u00d7 {(L \u2212 (N1+N2)\/2) + \u221a[(L \u2212 (N1+N2)\/2)\u00b2 \u2212 8((N2\u2212N1)\/2\u03c0)\u00b2]}. This gives the final centre distance to use in the installation \u2014 typically within a few millimetres of the original design value, adjusted by the take-up range of the tensioner.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n
    \nCan a chain drive achieve an exact integer ratio without violating the hunting tooth principle?<\/summary>\n
    Yes \u2014 if the tooth counts are co-prime (GCD = 1) despite the ratio being an integer approximation. For example, 17:34 gives an exact 2:1 ratio but GCD(17,34) = 17 \u2014 the hunting tooth principle is violated. However, 19:38 also gives 2:1 with GCD(19,38) = 19. The solution for a 2:1 ratio is to use 17:35 (ratio 2.06:1, GCD=1) rather than any combination where N2 = 2\u00d7N1. The hunting tooth principle is more important for long-life drives than achieving an exact integer ratio. For synchronised mechanical drives where an exact 2:1 or 3:1 ratio is geometrically necessary (e.g., a camshaft timing drive), accept the GCD constraint and rely on more frequent inspection intervals rather than the hunting tooth distribution mechanism.<\/div>\n<\/details>\n

    <\/p>\n

    \n
    <\/div>\n
    \n
    N2 = N1 \u00d7 i \u00a0\u2192\u00a0 PD = p \/ sin(180\u00b0 \/ N) \u00a0\u2192\u00a0 OD \u2248 PD + 0.625p<\/div>\n

    Need Sprockets Machined to Your Calculated Tooth Counts?<\/h2>\n

    Send your required ratio, shaft speeds, available envelope, and chain pitch \u2014 our engineers verify the tooth count combination against all five constraints and confirm bore machining specifications before manufacture.<\/p>\n

    Browse Custom Bore Sprockets<\/a>
    \n    Submit Your Calculation for Review<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    Redacteur: Cxm<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    i = N2 \/ N1 \u00a0\u2192\u00a0 n2 = n1 \u00d7 (N1 \/ N2) How to Calculate Sprocket Tooth Count for Any Speed Ratio Choosing sprocket tooth counts by working backwards from a required speed ratio, shaft speed, or torque output \u2014 and then checking those counts against the engineering constraints that determine whether the drive […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6634],"tags":[72,78,58],"class_list":["post-3335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chain-sprocket","tag-chain","tag-chain-sprocket","tag-sprocket"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3335"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3337,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3335\/revisions\/3337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sprocket-chain.net\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}